United States (FDA — BONSITY)
Regulator: BONSITY)
approved
As of: 9/10/2026 · Temporal status not established
Scientific intelligence record
Experience 2.0
Recombinant human parathyroid hormone fragment (PTH 1-34)
Teriparatide is the recombinant 1–34 amino-acid fragment of human parathyroid hormone and retains the receptor-active N-terminal region of PTH. Intermittent subcutaneous exposure activates PTH1 receptors in bone and kidney; in bone it increases osteoblast activity and remodeling, producing an anabolic treatment effect when used according to an approved regimen. Its effects depend on exposure pattern: intermittent therapeutic administration is not equivalent to sustained endogenous parathyroid-hormone excess. Evidence and authorization are formulation-, indication-, population-, duration-, and sequence-specific.
Record status
Traceability partial
Last meaningful update: 9/10/2026
Governed reviewed evidence
25
Governed records, not an efficacy score or total literature count.
Evidence boundary
0 / 25
Claim-linked support versus recorded evidence.
Research gaps
Human experience · separate evidence stream
Eligible observations remain below the privacy and reliability threshold. WPF will not convert a handful of reports into a percentage, trend, or clinical claim.
Observation is valuable human context. It is not evidence of causation, efficacy, or safety.
Public display gate
n ≥ 20 eligible observations
Exact progress remains private before the threshold.
Intelligence snapshot
A compact view of what is represented, what remains unresolved, and how completely the record can be traced.
Governed reviewed evidence
25
Reviewed database records promoted through the governed publication workflow.
Contradictions
0
Conflicting evidence relationships that remain visible.
Research gaps
1
Questions the current record identifies as unresolved.
Connected media
0
Media records explicitly linked to this scientific record.
What we know
The project separates represented evidence from qualification, contradiction, uncertainty, and what the evidence does not establish.
This does not mean the scientific literature contains no findings. It means no reviewed institutional claim has been represented here.
Scientific context
Existing reviewed chemistry is preserved as scientific context. Chemistry and mechanism information do not establish clinical efficacy or safety.
Explore further
Move from this peptide record into the project's broader evidence, research, comparison, and methodology systems.
Research
Chronology, unresolved research questions, opportunities, and researcher activity remain descriptive rather than evaluative.
2003 · study · Temporal status not established
The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics
2005 · study · Temporal status not established
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
2007 · study · Temporal status not established
The New England journal of medicine
2012 · study · Temporal status not established
Bone
Connections
Connections appear only when they are represented by the project’s underlying records.
institution
institution
institution
Traceability
The experience makes incomplete links visible instead of presenting a false impression of perfect provenance.
Source publication state
A governed source may be verified and approved for publication while its claim-to-evidence link is still incomplete.
Reviewer provenance state
“Human scientist reviewed: no” means that specific source-path attribution is not recorded. It does not silently negate the separate publication-review state.
Claim → Evidence
Incomplete
Evidence → Source
Connected
Source → Original record
Connected
Traceability documents how the project connects statements to records. It does not establish that a source is scientifically valid or that a claim is clinically true.
Incomplete links: claim-to-evidence
Efficacy of weekly teriparatide does not vary by baseline fracture probability calculated using FRAX.
Observational archive
Observational archive data is intentionally separated from published scientific evidence.
Observational boundary
Insufficient eligible observations are available for display under the current filters.
Insufficient eligible observations are currently represented to display aggregated findings for this peptide.
Regulatory context
Regulatory status is jurisdiction-specific and time-dependent. It is presented as context, not as a recommendation for use or a substitute for scientific evidence evaluation.
United States (FDA — BONSITY)
Regulator: BONSITY)
As of: 9/10/2026 · Temporal status not established
United States (FDA — FORTEO)
Regulator: FORTEO)
As of: 9/10/2026 · Temporal status not established
Research + media
Only media explicitly linked through the project’s relationship system appears here.
No scientifically connected media is currently represented for this peptide.
Sources + provenance
Teriparatide evidence · ranking key
A tier describes the evidentiary role and design strength of a source. It is not a popularity score, proof that every conclusion is correct, or a substitute for claim-level review.
Large, well-conducted randomized trials; prespecified major outcomes; rigorous systematic reviews or meta-analyses; and major regulatory assessments.
Smaller randomized trials, strong prospective cohorts, prespecified secondary analyses, and high-quality comparative-effectiveness studies.
Retrospective cohorts, claims-database studies, pharmacovigilance analyses, mechanistic human research, and well-documented case series.
Case reports, conference abstracts, preclinical research, hypothesis-generating analyses, and expert commentary.
Tier classifies source design and evidentiary role. Confidence reflects risk of bias, sample size, comparator quality, outcome relevance, follow-up, missing data, directness, replication, reporting quality, and whether conclusions stay within the measured results.
Governed scientific evidence
Duplicate-safe scientific sources under accountable human review. Identified or pending records do not contribute as approved evidence.
Audit view
Human and preclinical evidence remain separate. Source identity, claim-to-source traceability, review dates, conflicts, limitations, and unknowns stay visible rather than being collapsed into one score.
1
Unresolved questions remain visible.
Human experience
Below display gate
Observations never become clinical evidence.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of once-weekly teriparatide as a function of baseline fracture risk.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
SAL001, a recombinant form of parathyroid hormone, is a biosimilar drug to teriparatide and is planned to be used in osteoporosis treatment.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
In the absence of an intervening antiresorptive agent, cyclic administration of teriparatide does not increase bone mineral density (BMD) more than standard daily therapy.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Bisphosphonate therapy is the current standard of care for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
In this randomized, controlled trial, sequential therapy with once-weekly subcutaneous injection of teriparatide for 72 weeks, followed by alendronate for 48 weeks resulted in a significantly lower incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture than monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks in women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.
Unlike most chronic diseases, osteoporosis treatments are generally limited to a single drug at a fixed dose and frequency.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
No clinical trials have compared osteoporosis drugs with incident fractures as the primary outcome.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an infrequent but morbid and potentially serious condition associated with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic therapies.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Pelvic fracture patients were randomized to blinded daily subcutaneous teriparatide (TPTD) or placebo to assess healing and functional outcomes over 3 months.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Teriparatide was the first anabolic agent recommended for the treatment of osteoporosis.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
To compare the pharmacokinetics, relative bioavailability (RB), immunogenicity, and safety after a single dose of test or reference formulation of teriparatide in healthy human volunteers in order to demonstrate whether both products are similar.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
While changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM) have been reported to predict changes in bone mineral density (BMD), the relationship between changes in BMD and BTMs with combined antiresorptive/anabolic therapy is unknown.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Osteoporosis medications increase bone-mineral density (BMD) and lower but do not eliminate fracture risk.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
The relationship between prior fractures and risk of new fractures was evaluated in 931 postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures randomized to daily placebo or teriparatide (20 mug) in the Fracture Prevention Trial.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Current osteoporosis medications increase bone mineral density (BMD) modestly and reduce, but do not eliminate, fracture risk.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Daily teriparatide injections have been shown to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
PubMed-indexed source directly addressing teriparatide within its stated study design.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
The effects of daily teriparatide (20 μg) (D-PTH), weekly high-dose teriparatide (56.5 μg) (W-PTH), or bisphosphonates (BPs) on areal bone mineral density (aBMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), volumetric BMD (vBMD), microarchitecture, and estimated strength were investigated in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
In the Fracture Prevention Trial, the risks of any nonvertebral fracture (relative risk [RR] 0.65, P=0.04) and any fragility nonvertebral fracture (RR 0.47, P=0.02) were significantly reduced in the teriparatide 20 μg/day (teriparatide) versus placebo group.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Teriparatide and denosumab are effective treatments for osteoporosis and typically reserved as second-line options after patients have used bisphosphonates.
The prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing in the United States.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
The study found that in osteoporosis patients who had not previously received bisphosphonate treatment and were in a treatment cycle of over 12 months, both teriparatide and denosumab significantly increased bone mineral density compared to bisphosphonates.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Osteoporosis, defined by reduced bone mineral density and macro- and micro-architectural degradation, leads to increased fracture risk, particularly in aging populations.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
Fragility fractures are fractures that result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture.
This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.
Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.
Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.
Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0
This postmarketing surveillance study assessed the safety and effectiveness of teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Japan.
Chemical identity describes the recorded molecular information. It does not establish biological activity, clinical efficacy, safety, or therapeutic suitability.
2013 · study · Temporal status not established
Lancet (London, England)
2014 · study · Temporal status not established
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
2015 · study · Temporal status not established
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
2015 · study · Temporal status not established
Lancet (London, England)
2015 · study · Temporal status not established
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
2016 · study · Temporal status not established
International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
2016 · study · Temporal status not established
Clinical interventions in aging
2017 · study · Temporal status not established
Bone
2018 · study · Temporal status not established
Lancet (London, England)
2019 · study · Temporal status not established
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
2020 · study · Temporal status not established
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
2020 · study · Temporal status not established
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
2020 · study · Temporal status not established
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
2022 · study · Temporal status not established
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
2022 · study · Temporal status not established
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
2022 · study · Temporal status not established
Bone
2023 · study · Temporal status not established
Clinical pharmacology in drug development
2023 · study · Temporal status not established
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
2023 · study · Temporal status not established
Annals of internal medicine
2024 · study · Temporal status not established
Archives of osteoporosis
2025 · study · Temporal status not established
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
2026 · regulatory · Temporal status not established
United States (FDA — BONSITY)
2026 · regulatory · Temporal status not established
United States (FDA — FORTEO)
The represented chronology reflects records currently included in the governed dataset and does not claim to represent the entire scientific literature.
No institutional claim record is currently represented for this peptide.
Evidence is missing or not represented as studied; this is not a conclusion that the intervention does not work.
These are bibliographic author identities derived from represented records. Name strings are not proof of unique real-world researcher identity, and publishing organizations are not treated as institutional affiliations.
4 represented evidence records
Years represented: 2013, 2014, 2015, 2019
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Lancet (London, England), The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
3 represented evidence records
Years represented: 2013, 2014, 2015
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Lancet (London, England), The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
3 represented evidence records
Years represented: 2013, 2014, 2015
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Lancet (London, England), The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
3 represented evidence records
Years represented: 2013, 2014, 2015
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Lancet (London, England), The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
3 represented evidence records
Years represented: 2013, 2014, 2015
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Lancet (London, England), The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
3 represented evidence records
Years represented: 2013, 2014, 2015
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Lancet (London, England), The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
2 represented evidence records
Years represented: 2020, 2022
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
2 represented evidence records
Years represented: 2015
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
1 represented evidence record
Years represented: 2022
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Bone
1 represented evidence record
Years represented: 2018
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Lancet (London, England)
1 represented evidence record
Years represented: 2023
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Annals of internal medicine
1 represented evidence record
Years represented: 2020
Publishing organizations appearing in records: Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
institution
institution
institution
institution
institution
institution
institution
institution
institution
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 8747ed8824057cbe7cecc0f915024023
PMID: 26092062 · DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3129-7
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Biosimilarity Assessment of the Biosimilar Teriparatide Candidate and the Reference Drug in Healthy Subjects.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 4e381ec1032ae640ed849ae4fd42e5e1
PMID: 36710466 · DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1221
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Standard Versus Cyclic Teriparatide and Denosumab Treatment for Osteoporosis: A Randomized Trial.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: f825487e92c076169317d0fa9d840928
PMID: 31419313 · DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3850
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Teriparatide or alendronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: c66f1fefd1e317bd5c45c82ff8b6c7e5
PMID: 18003959 · DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa071408
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Sequential therapy with once-weekly teriparatide injection followed by alendronate versus monotherapy with alendronate alone in patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture: final results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 90d2d501dbace0574eeed9fbd87e0bb7
PMID: 36239756 · DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06570-0
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Denosumab and teriparatide transitions in postmenopausal osteoporosis (the DATA-Switch study): extension of a randomised controlled trial.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: de5c012da91a63ebf43c0251d5bc63ce
PMID: 26144908 · DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)61120-5
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 6ff99b045b2b29e9927d44f3b57976c1
PMID: 29129436 · DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32137-2
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Teriparatide Promotes Bone Healing in Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: ab0369c64072c4d0d5703e9fd3265a19
PMID: 32614699 · DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02192
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Teriparatide and pelvic fracture healing: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 842ac646c2c657da37e65196d8d5a70f
PMID: 34383100 · DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06065-4
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Teriparatide treatment in severe osteoporosis - a controlled 10-year follow-up study.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 24022a031bf625672a9fb9bde1daba02
PMID: 36424580 · DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05987-2
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Relative bioavailability between two teriparatide formulations in healthy volunteers.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 0433039100c6415f6084e97572dc7831
PMID: 27007999 · DOI: 10.5414/cp202562
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Relationship between bone turnover and density with teriparatide, denosumab or both in women in the DATA study.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: cc3f4d17b314eb8337bfc4d67ce632d0
PMID: 27840301 · DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.11.009
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Teriparatide and denosumab, alone or combined, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: the DATA study randomised trial.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: fba453eb1f3d30381fd50af946154c76
PMID: 23683600 · DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60856-9
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Teriparatide reduces the fracture risk associated with increasing number and severity of osteoporotic fractures.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: cf1356e1d6c8ecc880d5790251a35b7b
PMID: 15613428 · DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-0826
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Two years of Denosumab and teriparatide administration in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (The DATA Extension Study): a randomized controlled trial.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: cc788a9eb6991a6d451f112bb27cbd36
PMID: 24517156 · DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-4440
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
FRAX and the effect of teriparatide on vertebral and non-vertebral fracture.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: d49bc556af9f7b0da981ac280a72bad8
PMID: 26092063 · DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3173-3
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Teriparatide (forteo) for osteoporsis.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 83c837ae9164d7c08f0aabacdce16bb4
PMID: 12571538 · DOI: Unavailable
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Randomized controlled trial of daily teriparatide, weekly high-dose teriparatide, or bisphosphonate in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: The TERABIT study.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: cc7fc4d18e96b35491be1c20dbc2a0d4
PMID: 35398293 · DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116416
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Teriparatide and the risk of nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 508f3354e364bc1d141cb022bf03440f
PMID: 22036910 · DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.018
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Comparison of Teriparatide and Denosumab in Patients Switching From Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 0e894360d9a41b6575bf754a5478ed2d
PMID: 31265071 · DOI: 10.1210/jc.2019-00924
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in People With Low Bone Mass or Primary Osteoporosis: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: 91fe23f577af8cc28eca5e8616e2d381
PMID: 36592455 · DOI: 10.7326/m22-0684
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Efficacy and safety of teriparatide vs. bisphosphonates and denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in osteoporosis not previously treated with bisphosphonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: a9e05d6fefb39ed1ce4144c230516ea9
PMID: 39312040 · DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01447-7
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: aaeabc7b99b05dfbc4bd011c8585aca8
PMID: 40047881 · DOI: 10.1007/s00198-025-07440-1
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: f0e55845128d138e86edf8f2e0edb10b
PMID: 32588816 · DOI: 10.3310/hta24290
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Safety and effectiveness of daily teriparatide in a prospective observational study in patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Japan: final report.
Claim: Not linked · Evidence: ca7c29b7d152ad252c260ed5e93a4f79
PMID: 27462147 · DOI: 10.2147/cia.s107285
Extraction: not-recorded · Review: verified · Source state: unknown
Machine extracted: no · Human scientist reviewed: no · Externally validated: no
Incomplete path: claim, extraction-status
Generated: 9/18/2026, 3:04:06 PM
Funding and conflicts are disclosed and considered, but sponsorship never automatically changes a tier. Corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern override the original rating.
Evidence searched through: Not recorded
Last accountable review: Not recorded
These are documentary and scientific-review signals, not conclusions of harm, ineffectiveness, safety, or absence of research.
This maturity index describes evidence-base development and governance. It is not a probability of efficacy, safety, truth, medical advice, or regulatory approval. Read the methodology.